Connect with us


Gavin Williamson Raises National Security Issue over Huawei’s 5G Internet



Gavin Williamson

Gavin Williamson, Secretary of Defence, has raised deep concerns about possible national security threats occurring through Huawei, a Chinese tech giant.

Williamson said that he has “grave and very deep concerns” about the operations, and that the issue must be examined “very closely” because the Chinese state can use it “in a malign way.”

Huawei is a multinational telecommunications equipment company in China, which is a world leader in developing advance mobile internet technologies. Besides, the tech giant is among a group of companies that has developed superfast mobile 5G internet.

However, recently countries like Australia and New Zealand banned the company from providing 5G equipment citing national security grounds. The fear also remains for Britain, where the technology could be used to hack UK systems and spying on Britons.

Gavin Williamson said, “I have grave, very deep concerns about Huawei providing the 5G network in Britain. It’s something we’d have to look at very closely.”

“We’ve got to look at what partners such as Australia and the US are doing in order to ensure that they have the maximum security of that 5G network and we’ve got to recognise the fact, as has been recently exposed, the Chinese state does sometimes act in a malign way,” he said.

Australia and New Zealand, which banned Huawei network, are a part of the five-eyes group—the leading intelligence alliance of Britain including the US, the UK and Canada. Moreover, the intervention of both these countries could aid the other partners to impose a similar ban.

The Australian government informed that there were concerns that the internet networks being provided by the companies are “likely to be subject to extrajudicial directions from a foreign government.”

Defence Secretary Gavin Williamson has raised similar concerns for Britain. His comments came just a week after the country supported the United States and blamed China for a campaign of global cyber espionage to pilfer business secrets from the UK and allied countries.

This week, the chairman of Huawei, Liang Hua said that despite more bans, the company would continue to move with the 5G development. “In the face of a crisis of confidence from the West, we must do our own work well, and continue to build Huawei’s competitiveness in the field of 5G,” he said.

Being a significant technical country and decoding the systems of some strongest countries, China has created a substantial threat for Britain. The concerns of the Defence Secretary do hold water, since taking a risk on national security for high-speed internet would be completely irrational.


At least 130 Fulani villagers killed in Mali Massacre



Fulani villagers, Dogon

Members of the Dogon tribe have been accused of killing at least 130 Fulani villagers, and burning most of their village on Saturday. Conflict between the Fulanis and Dogon tribe has intensified since the government initiated a combat against the extremists in its desert regions.

Many more were injured in the cold-blooded massacre, which occurred in Ogossagou, a village dominated by the Muslim Fulani ethnic group of herders. The mass decimation is a result of increasing ethnic and Islamist violence in the West African nation.

The Mayor of town Bankass, Moulaye Guindo held the traditional Dogon hunters responsible for the attack. The two groups have long co-existed, but they have been involved in repeated clashes, after the outgrowth of jihadi violence.

According to the eyewitnesses, most of the houses in the village were completely destroyed. The Fulanis were attacked with machetes and guns.

One of the worst attacks in Ogossagou’s history

Guindo called it as one of the deadliest attacks in recent times. The Malian troops, with the help of locals, reached the site of the mass murder later in the afternoon.

Moreover, the attack was carried during a delegation from the UN Security Council was paying a visit to West Africa’s Sahel region, in order to estimate the jihadist threat.

Long-standing Animosities

In the past, there have been recurrent clashes between the Fulani and the Dogon tribes over cattle-grazing on each other’s land, as well as conflicts over access to land and water.

Jihadist forces linked to militant groups, including al-Qaeda and Islamic State (IS) have taken advantage of ethnic animosities in Mali and its neighboring regions in the recent years, aiming to promote recruitment and outlawry.

Mali, the epitome of democracy and stability in Africa, has been adversely affected by civil war and Islamist terrorism, ever-since the extremists took the reins of the desert north in 2012.

Continue Reading


Saudi’s Dented Image Faces Rejection from Italian Opera House



La Scala

Last updated on March 24th, 2019

The Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, which seems unscathed from the consequences of its radical orthodoxies, is actually facing the repercussions it probably wouldn’t have expected. The diversification plan opted by the Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman is certainly not progressing at a pace he envisioned.

Recently, an evidently diverse area touched by the Kingdom, refused to welcome its proposal. One of the most significant opera houses in the world, the Teatro alla Scala in Milan announced to return the Saudi investment of over three million euros, citing the past records of the Arab nation.

Adverse criticism crept in, since the announcement of the concord between Italy’s premier temple of music and the Saudi government. Over the time period of five years, the Kingdom would have invested a total of €15 million for obtaining the position on the board for its culture minister.

On Monday, the board of La Scala voted to return €3.1 million, which was provided by Riyadh as the first share of the funding. The Centre-Left Mayor of Milan Giuseppe Sala highlighted that the funds had been placed in an escrow account, but would now be returned.

According to his statement, the board of directors at the theatre “unanimously decided to return the money” after deliberating over the issue. Sala also stated that it didn’t meant a rebuff to the Saudis. “There is no black list,” he said, adding that the decision was taken because the business was “handled badly”.

On the other hand, the Italian critics argued that the country with a terrifying human rights record shouldn’t be allowed to obtain any position in the opera house. They believe that Saudi’s past violations are uncongenial to the values of a democratic country incorporated by La Scala.

Businesses and institutions across the world have been refraining from accepting Saudi funds, since the Arab nation’s role was proved in the killing and dismemberment of The Washington Post journalist, Jamal Khashoggi, inside the Saudi consulate in Istanbul in October.

For Saudi, La Scala’s rejection is the second this month, which is a result of its oppressive principles and the reported human rights abuses. A talent agency, Endeavor also announced to return a $400 million investment of Saudi Arabia, on March 8.

The Kingdom, which is on the trail of diversifying its economy, is being tremendously dented by its own repressive and extremist theory. A columnist for Corriere della Sera, Giangiacomo Schiavi believes that its “a country that instead of respecting human rights, treads on them”.

While the global institutions are turning down the Arab nation’s substantial investments, Saudi’s plans of diversifying its economy are going in vain. The reputation that the country doesn’t seem to care about, is gradually affecting it at a much deeper level.

The oil-rich Gulf country is also striving to mend the impact of self-inflicted wounds. The Financial Times recently reported that the country has recently signed a $120,000-a-month contract with New York-base Karv Communications, in order to enhance its image and repair the diplomatic damage followed by the Khashoggi killing.

Saudi Arabia is already tussling to save itself from extensive dependency on oil, but its deteriorating repute is becoming a massive obstruction in undertaking the objective. While the circumstances are turning unfavourable, the country is trying to wipe off the traces of its jarring actions. But, could the brutal killing of Khashoggi and other barbarous acts of Saudi be ever forgotten?

Continue Reading


US Decision on Syrian Troops Left Muddled After WSJ Report



US troops Syria

A decision that the United States President Donald Trump took three months ago has been altered as many times as it should have. On December 19, he announced to pull out American troops from the Syrian Arab Republic without any deliberations, causing the White House jitters. The precipitancy of the decision has led to several changes since then.

Another update was recently reported by the Wall Street Journal, stating that the US military is planning to keep nearly 1,000 militants in the war-torn country for achieving their objective of defeating the Islamic State group and averting any potential threats.

The report came as a major shift from Trump’s initial decision of complete withdrawal of more than 2,000 US troops, and was far more than the recent modifications made in the original declaration. Few weeks back, it was announced that a total of 400 American forces would still stay back in Syria, as a reversal to what Trump initially intended.

On Sunday, the Journal reported that the US intends to continue working with the Syrian Kurds, who are under a threat from Turkey. Citing the American officials, it stated that the shift in plans came as the talks between the US, the Kurds, European allies and Turkey have failed to establish a safe zone in Syria.

However, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, General Joseph Dunford refuted the report, calling it “factually incorrect”. He stated, “There has been no change to the plan announced in February and we continue to implement the President’s direction to draw down US forces to a residual presence.”

The US official said that certain plans have exceeded the number of 400 forces, and there are several potential figures that could be announced. However, he confirmed that no final decision has been taken so far. Dunford suggested that the actual plan is to ensure a safe zone in northern Syria by keeping a combined force of about 1,500 troops.

The Journal’s report also stated that the United States is likely to withdraw hundreds of American forces, after “the last bastion” of ISIS is seized.

As per the reports, the US-backed Syrian fighters are on a mission of completely ending the presence of ISIS, by destructing their last enclave in Syria. The operation that was becoming difficult is now on the verge of conclusion, as the forces have seized the Baghouz village giving space to the group.

The claims regarding the American presence in Syria have been changed several times, since the withdrawal has been announced. The decision had initially caused a great turmoil in the White House and had also led to a resignation from one of the most significant members of the administration: Defense Secretary James Mattis.

While the US mission in Syria still remains unachieved, the number of troops that would stay back is also uncertain. Moreover, several changes to the original decision have induced a great confusion about the final decision of the Trump administration.

Continue Reading


Saudi King allegedly devoid Mohammed bin Salman of some authority



Saudi King Salman with Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman of Saudi Arabia

Saudi Arabia Crown Prince, Mohammed bin Salman has been divested of a couple of his financial and economic authority, The Guardian has reported. The throne inheritor did not turn up for some high-profile ministerial and diplomatic meetings in the Kingdom, over the last fortnight.

The impediment to Crown Prince’s responsibilities, if only briefly, is apparently disclosed to a group of senior ministers by his father, King Salman.

The leap in the House of Saud has not been declared publicly, but according to the Guardian, one of the king’s close advisers, Musaed al-Aiban, who was recently appointed as national security adviser, will colloquially supervise investment decisions in lieu of the King.

The father-son relationship, allegedly, turned sour after the murder of Saudi journalist Jamal Khashoggi in Istanbul’s Saudi consulate. The CIA concluded Mohammed bin Salman’s involvement in the killing, which provoked international uproar against the Crown Prince.

Moreover, the Saudi-led coalition’s role in the Yemen war has stirred up tension in the Saudi royal court.

Saudi King Salman is, apparently, irked by his son’s absence from the important cabinet meeting held recently, during which many crucial challenges facing the Kingdom were discussed.

According to the Guardian, several concerns over plunging investments into Saudi Arabia were brought to the table. The King ordered for his prior approval for major future financial decisions.

Apart from Khashoggi’s murder and deadly war on Yemen, Saudi Arabia is also facing international backlash over human rights abuses of critics and political detainees, including a dual American-Saudi citizen, Walid Fitaihi, who has been detained without charges.

The tensions between the elderly King and his son further escalated after Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman revealed two important decisions, while King Salman left for an official visit to Egypt.

First being the appointment of Princess Reema bint Bandar bin Sultan as Saudi ambassador to the United States, and secondly the promotion of his brother, Khalid bin Salman, to the ministry of defence, without seeking the king’s consent.

Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman did not receive the King at the airport upon his return to Saudi Arabia from Egypt, according to the protocols.

Further, the declarations to implement the changes were signed by the Saudi Crown Prince in his role as “deputy king,” which was a rare act.

The Saudi embassy in Washington did not respond to Guardian’s requests for comment.

Continue Reading


Mass Shootings at New Zealand Christchurch Mosques, Dozens Killed



Christchurch shooting

On Friday, incidences of deadly mass shootings in the New Zealand city of Christchurch shook the entire country. Dozens of people have been killed in mass shootings at two mosques full of people attending the Friday prayer. The police asked the people to remain indoors till the possibility of more than one gunman wasn’t ruled out.

New Zealand Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern called the violence as “one of New Zealand’s darkest days”. She also added that the mass shooting in the city of Christchurch represented “an extraordinary and unprecedented act of violence”.

Police Commissioner Mike Bush said that one person has been arrested, but it was too soon to predict the involvement of other people. He also warned people not to be around a mosque anywhere in the country.

The officials have not yet disclosed who they have arrested. However, a man has claimed the responsibility for the shootings. He left a 74-page anti-immigrant manifesto, explaining his identity and giving a reason behind his violent actions. He called the dreadful event a terrorist attack.

The man in his manifesto said he was a 28-year-old white Australian who came to New Zealand just to plan and train for the attack. He also said that he didn’t belong to any organisation, but had worked with many nationalist groups. He said he acted alone in these mass shootings and no group had ordered the attack.

At a news conference, Ardern hinted at anti-immigrant sentiment as the possible motive behind the mass shooting in the city of Christchurch. She said that while many people who have been affected by the incidence may be migrants or refugees “they have chosen to make New Zealand their home, and it is their home. They are us. The person who has perpetuated this violence against us is not”.

At least 40 people have been killed and more than 20 wounded. “It’s a very serious and grave situation,” Bush said.

Masjid Al Noor mosque in central Christchurch witnessed the most fatal shooting at around 1:45 pm.

Len Peneha, a witness who lives close to the mosque, saw a man dressed in black entering the mosque and then heard multiple shots, with people running out of the mosque. He said the gunman later ran out of the holy place, dropping a semi-automatic weapon in his driveway. Peneha then went inside to help.

“I saw dead people everywhere. There were three in the hallway, at the door leading into the mosque, and people inside the mosque,” he said. “It’s unbelievable nutty. I don’t understand how anyone could do this to these people, to anyone. It’s ridiculous.”

Peneha said the gunman, who was white, wore a helmet with a device attached on its top, giving him military-type resemblance.

A second shooting took place at the Linwood Masjid Mosque, police said.

The man who claimed the responsibility of the attacks said his main targets would be mosques in Christchurch and Linwood. He also aimed for a third shooting at a mosque in the town of Ashburton, if possible.

He chose New Zealand as his target location because he wanted to prove that even the remotest parts of the world were not free of “mass immigration”.

Continue Reading