Connect with us

News

12 Years Later, Taylor Swift Set to Break MJ’s Record at American Music Awards

Mirror News Desk

Published

on

American Music Awards

2019 has been an eventful year for Taylor Swift, especially with the success of her music video ‘Me’, and sixth album ‘Lover’. The historic return at the MTV VMA 2019 and to “The Voice” for season 17 as a Mega Mentor has further kept Swift in centre of the spotlight throughout the year.

And with confirmation that the 29-year-old singer will receive the Artist of the Decade award at American Music Awards (AMA), “Love Story” singer will match the count of 24 awards of the legendary Michael Jackson.

Moreover, the “All too Well” singer is also nominated for five more awards at the AMA. The category of her nominations comprise of Favourite Music Video, Favourite Female Artist, Favourite Album, Favourite Artist and the top spot of Artist of the Year.

And if Swift wins any of the awards, she will annihilate the record set by the King of Pop creating a new name for herself in the history of music for achieving maximum number of awards at the American Music Awards.

Amongst all the facts to marvel at, one of the notable facts is that when Taylor Swift launched her first song “Tim McGraw” in 2006, Jackson was a prominent global figure. However, he had moved past his prime and delivered one of the worst appearances of his career at the World Music Festival.

But by that time he had already won 20 AMA awards, which itself was an accomplishment for the global figure. Later in 2009, Michael Jackson won four more AMA awards to reach the tally of 24. On the other hand, Swift had only won two AMA awards by then, one in 2007 and the other in 2008.

Speaking on providing Swift with the Artist of the Decade award, the American Music Awards official twitter page said, “She’s won more #AMAs than anyone this decade… She’s a five-time 2019 #AMAs nominee… AND she’s performing at this year’s #AMAs LIVE on Nov. 24… @taylorswift13 is our ARTIST OF THE DECADE.”

Apart from the statement by AMA, Mark Bracco, Executive Vice President of programming & development at Dick Clark productions, also praised Swift for her accomplishment.

He said, “Taylor’s impact on music this decade is undeniable and her performances on the American Music Awards have been truly spectacular. We’re thrilled to honour her as our Artist of the Decade and can’t wait for her to blow everyone away with an epic, career-spanning performance unlike any other!”

While Swifties are eagerly waiting for her to establish new records now and then, there are high chances that Swift will become a name holding record number of AMA awards, in comparison to any other global singer. The only question, will Swift set a new record or not, will be answered on Sunday, November 24, and until then what other new record she sets will be worth to watch.

News

Jo Swinson Delivers Flurry of Promises in Poorly Launched Manifesto

Mirror News Desk

Published

on

Jo Swinson

With General Elections less than a month away, the leader of Liberal Democrats, Jo Swinson, has released a flurry of promises in her election manifesto. Although the general elections have brought along a series of concerns, the election manifesto launch at the nightclub in north London seemed to mock those concerns.

Amidst nearing elections, the entire nation continues to figure out the moves that might root out the knife crime altogether, boost foreign relations post-Brexit, and enact policies so that Brexit does not negatively impact the economy, trade sector and employment sector.

In such a scenario, the promise of £50 billion as remain bonus, legalisation of cannabis for people over 18+ and creating programs to improve the condition of drug addicts and reduce prisoners, seems too good to be true.

Moreover, Jo Swinson has promised to ensure the flow of such a large amount by remaining with the European Union as it would provide a boost to the trade sector and economy of the country.

Other eye-catching points of Lib Dems’ election manifesto include increasing the number of teachers in school and their salaries, achieving 80 percent of energy through renewable sources, scrapping the UK’s continuous at-sea nuclear deterrent but maintaining a downgraded capability, replacing business rates in England with a Commercial Landowner Levy and constructing more homes and buildings each year.

With all these fascinating policies, it is pretty evident that Jo Swinson has completely utilised her learnings during the time she was a Business Minister in David Cameroon’s government.

Additionally, these policies portray the fact that the manifesto was introduced to lure all sections of society. However, the only limitation of these policies is the question, would remaining in the European Union provide funds for all of the above policies. And if not, what is the backup plan of the former business minister.

Aside from introducing flurry of promises, the other point that might stick out with the voters is the launch of the election manifesto. 39-year-old Jo Swinson launched the manifesto during a party at a nightclub and not during an official release with other party officials.

Additionally, calling Brexit ‘national humiliation’, which was decided democratically three years ago, might not go well with pro-Brexiteers or those seeking second referendum, and can even spark criticism from many, resulting in a further drop of support of Lib Dems in the YouGov polls.

If launching an election manifesto in a night club is set aside and the manifesto is looked upon closely, the manifesto might tip the voters in the favour of Lib Dems, possibly helping them in gaining more than 21 MPs in the House of Commons.

Continue Reading

News

Election Debate: Twitter Condemns Conservatives for Playing with Accounts

Mirror News Desk

Published

on

Election Debate

The fire of criticisms ahead of the general elections is like a usual order that brings more transparency in the parties’ doings and the policies they support. Recently, Twitter issued a warning against Conservative Party that rebranded one of its Twitter accounts “factcheckUK” during an ITV general election debate poll.

The debate that took place between Conservative Party leader Boris Johnson and Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn on Tuesday drew huge condemnation from the users and the organisations on social media platforms.

Both the leaders clashed over which of them is best placed to safeguard the NHS if they win the general election, with the Labour leader accusing the prime minister of being ready to sell it off to US corporations.

Even though the Twitter handle was solely based for the Conservative Party press office (CCHQPress), the name and images on the page were switched to a purple background with a checkmark and name “factcheckUK”. The account was used to check facts of Corbyn’s statements during the election debate between the leaders.

As the CCHQPress account carries a blue verified badge by Twitter, it signified the fact that it was a real account. Even though the name and branding of the account was changed during the election debate, it succeeded in keeping its badge of authenticity. On retweets, the name “factcheckUK” was displayed to the users.

Most of the Twitter users called the move as misleading the citizens, while the Twitter spokesperson warned that “any further attempts to mislead people by editing verified profile information – in a manner seen during the UK Election Debate – will result in decisive corrective action”.

An independent British fact-checking charity, Full Fact, condemned the change of name and the purpose amid a pivotal election debate as inappropriate and misleading.

“Please do not mistake it for an independent fact checking service,” the charity wrote.

According to one of the Twitter policies, the social media platform is allowed to permanently suspend the accounts that pose as another person, brand, or organisation in a confusing or deceptive manner. This is called Twitter’s impersonation policy, which is enacted upon violation of its rules.

Other than FactCheck, Labour Party has joined the wave of criticism saying, “Conservatives’ laughable attempt to dupe those watching the #ITVDebate by renaming their twitter account shows you can’t trust a word they say.”

Against the criticisms, the Conservative Party chairman James Cleverly said that the Twitter account was clearly identified as conservative, and was fact-checking the claims put forward by Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn. “It makes it absolutely clear it’s a conservative website, absolutely clear,” he further added.

The Conservative Party has been under fire earlier also for misleading usage of social media platforms, by posting unreal data related to the opposition. In the wake of misleading contents, Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey in late October announced the banning of political ads on its platform.

The policy that is to come into effect on November 22 will severely affect the online campaigning of different parties and put an end to acts defaming the political party’s image before elections.

Despite the criticisms, Johnson handed 51-49 win in election debate poll, indicating the fact that he is still the favourite amongst Britons.  

Continue Reading

News

Labour’s Pledge to Eliminate Wildlife Crimes Might Turn Brexit’s Fate

Mirror News Desk

Published

on

Wildlife Crimes

As the general elections are nearing, members of both Labour and Conservative Party have been in a tussle, contesting to win. In the wake of inefficient Brexit delays, it appears that the leadership evaluations will highly impact the voting behaviours of the citizens, for the leaders are the human face of election campaigns.

Despite all the challenges that the political leaders of the two major parties have been facing, Labour Party has made some big announcements to combat wildlife crimes. The decision came days after the Conservative Party announced that on winning the election they will triple the tree planting rates.

Labour Party has promised to spend £4.5m on 82 new officers, who would be responsible for tackling wildlife crimes including banning fox hunting, hare coursing, maiming and killing wild animals, if it succeeds in winning the general elections scheduled for December 12.  

As has been noted, the government has continuously failed in meeting its international obligations to protect its most important wildlife sites and vulnerable species. As a result of which, it now lags behind other EU countries on its key criteria of co-existence.

Though the government previously pledged to improve environment record, but the European report shows no progress defending designated habitats. The Tories’ latest decision to preserve nature has attracted more hostile criticisms from the opposition but no such announcement has been made in terms of protecting wildlife species.

The EU has long set rules regarding animal welfare and works with the international community to fight illegal wildlife trade. Will the UK’s exit from the EU post Brexit bring an end to such practices and lead to more wildlife crimes in the country? If the voters, consider this as a possibility then Johnson-led government’s long fight for holding general elections, which has now become a reality, would be futile.

A recent report stated that 64 percent of the species assessed in the UK were either in “bad”, “poor” or “unknown” condition, which was up from the 57 percent diagnosed in between 2007-12. As of now, only 88 police staff, including civilian managers and community support officers, are dedicated to keep an eye on wildlife crimes.

Such statistics poses a serious question on the credibility of the UK achieving a strong, independent and environmental watchdog status, without a dramatic increase in the funding of environmental monitoring and restoration before Brexit. Henceforth, Labour’s move of addressing wildlife crimes is considered to be a wise move by many analytics.

Meanwhile, the Shadow Environment Secretary Sue Hayman said that the policy would “help protect both wild animals and property in rural communities”.

As known, increasing the number of wildlife and rural police officers across the country will help to gradually reduce wildlife crimes, promoting the UK’s promise of preserving nature and its precious species from the threat of extinction. But will the Labours succeed in winning the general elections on the disclosed motive at a time when the Conservatives have already announced their environment friendly program?  

Continue Reading

News

Did Britain Commit War Crimes in Iraq, Afghanistan under the Shadow of its Position?

Mirror News Desk

Published

on

British Army

The British army that has been deployed in Afghanistan and Iraq from the past few years as part of security responsibility for millions of citizens residing in both the countries, is accused of committing war crimes, leading to death of children and civilians’ torture.

Earlier, both in Iraq and Afghanistan, British soldiers were granted the permissions to kill unarmed civilians on suspicions of being spotters. There was an increase in violence and attacks against them by local fighters and militants, who opposed the British military occupation in their country.

It is believed to have started in Amrah in South East Iraq as early as June 2004, in the middle of intense fighting between the British army and Shia militia groups. To halt the violence and war crimes committed by the troops, international military campaign was later set up in Afghanistan and Iraq.

Iraq historic allegations team (IHAT) and Operation Northmoor was set up by the British government in 2010 and 2014 respectively to keep an eye on British army’s doings in Iraq and Afghanistan. Another aim of such campaign was to reduce the terrorist threats that rose with Taliban’s growing control in Afghanistan.

At present, around 1,000 British soldiers are deployed in Afghanistan.

The IHAT inquiry firm was established after 146 Iraqi men claimed to have been tortured at the hands of the British army, while Operation Northmoor was set up post 52 alleged illegal killings in Afghanistan.

Both IHAT and Operation Northmoor were closed in 2017 by the British government after the campaigning human rights lawyer Phil Shiner was struck off on grounds of multiple professional misconduct charges, including dishonesty and lack of integrity.

Many former IHAT and Operation Northmoor investigators said Shiner’s actions were used as an excuse to close down the inquiries.

The recently leaked documents from Iraq historic allegations team (IHAT) and Operation Northmoor contained evidences of murders by a senior SAS soldier, who was referred to prosecutors for attempting to pervert the course of justice as well as year-long investigations related to deaths in custody, beatings, torture and sexual abuse of detainees by members of the Black Watch.

In context of allegations on British government’s hindering the investigations, a spokesman from Ministry of Defence said, “Allegations that the MoD interfered with investigations or prosecution decisions relating to the conduct of UK forces in Iraq and Afghanistan are untrue.”

“Throughout the process, the decisions of prosecutors and the investigators have been independent of the MoD and involved external oversight and legal advice.”

The MoD said cases were referred to the independent Service Prosecuting Authority (SPA) as a result of investigations in both Iraq and Afghanistan.

“Cases from Iraq were referred as a result of historic investigations. It is untrue to claim cases investigated under Operation Northmoor in Afghanistan were not acted upon. After careful investigation, overseen by a former chief constable, no Northmoor cases were referred to prosecutors,” the spokesman said.

Though the reports of British army committing crimes were dismissed by many leaders as flawed, baseless and biased, it has succeeded in spreading misinformation against the brave servicemen. While some of the citizens remained troubled with the disclosure of such a news, many found it hard to get a hang of it.

Continue Reading

News

Tories and Lib Dems Begin Tree Planting Race ahead of General Elections

Mirror News Desk

Published

on

Tree Planting

Prior to the General Election 2019, the Conservative Party has announced that on winning the election they will triple tree planting rates. The Liberal Democrats responded by claiming to plant double the amount of trees planted by Tories.

The government has planned to work with devolved administrations to hike tree planting rates to 30,000 hectares every year, which means 30 million more trees. In order to increase tree planting in England, Boris Johnson has announced a £640 million Nature for Climate fund.

Taking an upper edge in the said demands, the Lib Dems have highlighted that the Tories have “woefully failed to meet their own targets for planting trees in the past year.” Moreover, the leader of the former political party, Jo Swinson, has promised to plant 60 million trees every year, labelling it as “the largest tree-planting programme in UK history.”

The Labour Party has said that its tree planting plans will be guided by science as forestry experts have announced the need for a huge programme if the UK wants to reduce its carbon emissions to effectively zero.

As per forest experts, even though the aim is tough to achieve, it’s still feasible. The success of the plan lays entirely on careful planning – “to get the right trees in the right places”. They have announced that there is dire need to properly fund the effort, meaning coordinating many different government agencies, forestry organisations and farmers.

As per an advisory group of experts in science, the Committee on Climate Change (CCC), there is a need to plant 30,000 hectares of woodland annually. Till March 2019, only 15,000 hectares of land was planted.

Johnson says that there is “nothing more conservative than protecting our environment”. The new tree planting measures planned would “sit alongside our world-leading commitment” to reduce greenhouse gas emissions to net zero by 2050.

It is quite probable that the conservatives are looking to use the slogan – “Vote Blue, Go Green” that was adopted by David Cameron in 2010.

Countering vows made by the Conservatives, the Labour Party said that the former had failed to meet previously set tree planting targets showing that they “aren’t serious about this agenda”.

The former environment secretary Michael Gove had blamed the Common Agricultural Policy for the government not being able complete its promised targets.

Gove posited support on the decision to leave the European Union, claiming that the government is not able to deliver on the 2015 manifesto promise to plant 11 million trees by 2020.

Continue Reading

Trending